Sunday, January 31, 2016

Exercise Is Medicine: Imprecision and Impracticality


Exercise is not medicine, and suggestions to the contrary do nothing to help fitness trainers improve the health of their clients.



"An apple a day keeps the doctor away."



This popular saying portrays certain activities as having the ability to improve health. Most people accord a notion of truth to the adage, but would anyone suggest a farmer or retailer could be held out as an exemplar of a health or medical profession? Probably not.



Yet this is exactly what the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) is trying to do with Exercise Is Medicine (EIM)—a media campaign, a proposed system of physician-based physical-activity prescription and referral, and a revenue-generating set of credentials offered by the ACSM.



The fitness industry is not medicine. Any organization that argues fitness is medicine is overreaching its operational scope and pandering to its members and the populace, all in hopes of weaseling into a place alongside medicine, nursing, physical therapy and athletic training as a licensed profession.



The ACSM must be encouraged to cease its attempts to confuse and misclassify fitness delivery to healthy individuals as medicinal physical activity in order to advance its own agenda at the expense of its partners, its competitors and fitness trainers everywhere. Although fundamentally different, physical activity and exercise can indeed be medicine—but only if disease or injury is present. The ACSM should concern itself with physical activity and exercise as therapy for disease and as rehabilitation. It should leave fitness for the masses to others.



CrossFit Founder and CEO Greg Glassman has described exercise training as "non-medical health care that works." In the context of the gym, this means trainers in the fitness industry aren't diagnosing or prescribing anything. They are teaching and training fitness, and the byproduct of their services is better health and function in their customers. In contrast to the goals of the ACSM and EIM, these are outcomes CrossFit and the evolving fitness industry can deliver.

3 of the Best: This Week's Top Articles, Vol. 15

These pieces have caught your attention throughout the week. So here they are in one place for you to consume, digest, and enjoy.

Welcome to our brand new weekend roundup, Three of the Best! Every Sunday, we'll post up Breaking Muscle's top three articles of the week. These pieces have caught your attention throughout the last seven days. So here they are in one place for you to consume, digest, and enjoy.



read more

The Myth of More Is Better

Society's obsession with work ethic is destroying the efficacy of your training.

Look around, and you will find yourself surrounded by people telling you “More Is Better.” This line of thought is also prevalent in the minds of athletes as they approach training. Unfortunately, it has led to an epidemic of Tommy John (UCL surgery) in baseball and a culture that thinks Insanity and CrossFit’s get-them-tired approach to training is the point of every workout.




read more

Friday, January 29, 2016

Count Colors, Not Calories: 2 Recipes for a Colorful Plate

Nutrition advice has never been more simple. Eat a rainbow of foods everyday.

So many people are quick to point out the inadequacies of food pyramids. But only focusing on criticism is boring. Let’s ask a different question: what do we do about it? What is the one food change we can make that is easy, simple, and relevant to everyone?



I say eat a rainbow of whole foods every day.



read more

Lifts vs Assistance Exercises

by Mark Rippetoe



“Training is not about today. It is about the process of going from where you are now to here you want to be later, for the purpose of meeting a specific performance goal. . . During a training cycle, each individual workout is important only because of its place in the whole process.”


[A version of this article originally appeared on T-Nation, 4-14-2013]

Read More


var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true};





Training is not about today. It is about the process of going from where you are now to here you want to be later, for the purpose of meeting a specific performance goal. . . During a training cycle, each individual workout is important only because of its place in the whole process.


If strength is the objective (and it should be for everybody), understanding the difference between training and exercising is fundamental to being an effective athlete and an effective coach. So is understanding the difference between the basic barbell movements – the primary exercises – and the assistance exercises, the ones most people worry the most about.What is the difference between an effective strength coach and a physical therapist pretending to be a strength coach? What is the difference between a lifter who gets big and strong and the gym rat who’s been the same skinny kid for the past three years? What is the difference between a frustrated P90Xer/CrossFitter and a successful strength athlete? What is the difference between a productive trainer and a personal trainer that is, in actuality, a paid babysitter/rep counter and paid friend for those who can afford her?In each of these four examples, the former understand the difference between the primary exercises and the assistance exercises; they understand what the primary and assistance exercise are used and how they are programmed. In each of the four examples, the latter – the physical therapist, the gym rat, the fad trainer and the highly paid ineffective personal trainer – doesn’t have a clue. The former structure their training around primary exercises and program them, the primary exercises, for long-term progress, using assistance exercises only when progress has slowed on the primary exercises.The ill-informed think that variety is the objective and that boredom is the enemy, that the pump, sweat, fatigue, and soreness are the hallmarks and the objective of an effective workout, not realizing that these things are just the side-effects of what happened today, and are not the indicators of progress. The uninformed don’t understand that athletes getting stronger are not bore-able, that measurable increases in the weight used on the basic exercises is required, and that the inclusion of new “moves” in every workout – exercises that inherently lack the ability to drive basic strength – does not accomplish one single solitary thing if strength is the objective. They lose sight of the fact that “muscle confusion” is a rather odd concept, and that doing dozens of different exercises actually prevents productive training for strength acquisition. This is the nuts-and-bolts difference between effective strength training and wasting time and potential.How many times have you seen the following:

Magazine articles about the variety of exercises available for “doing arms,” “legs,” “back,” “abs,” or, worst of all, “The Core.” The fucking Core. The thing that’s always stronger on a man with a 500 squat.
Infomercials for weight loss or “ab” development programs that emphasize the number of exercises available to accomplish this miraculous transformation.
New York Times pieces about the new “moves” (exercises) for 2013 for firming and toning your abs/inner thighs/outer thighs/arms/neck/“sidemeat”/“Buttissimo.”
Books written by Physical Therapists that detail the different exercises that are absolutely necessary to strengthen your Core. All of them, absolutely necessary, none of them programmable for improvement for 6 months, or even 6 weeks. Because they can’t be.

Successful lifters, bodybuilders, and strength athletes all share one thing in common: their training is based around six or seven basic barbell movements, and the variables that are manipulated are volume, intensity, and rest, NOT the number of exercises. Because there aren’t very many exercises that can actually be trained.First, “Training” and “Exercise” are different things entirely. Training is the process of directed physical stress which results in an adaptation that satisfies a performance goal. Since different performances require different physical abilities, and different tasks produce different types of stress, and since stress causes an adaptation (if you can recover from it), therefore different physical abilities are acquired by doing different physical tasks, and the training stresses that facilitate these different adaptations must be specific to the performance goal being trained for. Duh, right?Exercise ignores this fact. Exercise is what happens when you go to the gym and do exactly the same thing you did last time you went to the gym, or when you do P90X, CrossFit, or any other randomized program. These activities are performed for one reason: the effect they produce for you today, right now. Fucking around in the gym is merely punching the ticket – you showed up, moved some stuff around, got sweaty, tired, and maybe out of breath, but you did the same thing Friday as you did Wednesday, and now that you think of it, the same thing you did Monday. The harder programs like CrossFit and P90X are about the “burn,” the sweat, the heart rate, the feeling of being “gassed” or “thrashed” or “fried” or “crushed” – they are about the perceived physical effects of the workout as or immediately after the exercises are performed. The random nature of the exercises ensures that you will be “crushed” every time, because it guarantees that you will not adapt to the work. Either way, they are really about what happens today.Training is not about today. It is about the process of going from where you are now to here you want to be later, for the purpose of meeting a specific performance goal – usually at a specific time for more advanced trainees on a competitive schedule, but at first for the simple purpose of completing the novice phase of training, the first few months when it’s easier to add weight every workout and get strong very quickly. During a training cycle, each individual workout is important only because of its place in the whole process. Subjective judgements about how the workout felt are important only to the extent that they provide information that would make the next workout better. Much more important is this basic question: Did you meet your numbers on the squat, press, and deadlift today? {pagebreak}Training cannot be accomplished randomly, because randomly applied stresses do not create a specific adaptation. For example, squatting 5 sets of 5 once every 3 to 5 weeks, or whenever Pukie posts it, does not apply a stress that can be adapted to – and built upon – before detraining to the stress occurs. This is especially true if during the intervening period many other stresses have been applied that conflict with the adaptation necessary to get better at squatting heavier sets of 5 – doing hundreds of reps of unweighted squats, for example. Or doing hundreds of reps of anything, if the performance goal is doing 5 reps or 1 rep with a very heavy weight. Or doing nothing at all, which in itself is a stress that will be adapted to.Since Training is a process designed to produce an adaptation, this process necessarily entails more than a short period of time, because the adaptations that are necessary for high-level performance take time to accomplish. Strength, for example, can be improved for many years if the processes that produce it can be continued uninterrupted by injury or distraction. The closer you get to your genetic potential for any given adaptation for performance, the slower the progress will be and the more critical the method by which the stress is applied will become. This is merely the principle of diminishing returns, whereby a value approaches a limit asymptotically, and is in evidence all throughout the universe.It must be said that not everybody is interested in Training. For lots of people, Exercise is good enough. They just want to burn some calories, get a little conditioning work, and have better abs. This is fine, for these people. But the second you want more – when you decide that there will now be a goal to accomplish with all this gym time – you have graduated to Training.
Now that you’re all grown up, which exercises will you use to get there? Considering our previous analysis, you’ll need to choose movements that have the capacity to produce the desired adaptation over the long timeframe that profound, transformative adaptation requires. If you’re a runner, you’ll run; a swimmer, you’ll swim. After your initial novice phase, where the gains come quickly, you’ll vary your workloads by manipulating volume and intensity over longer periods of time. If you’re a smart runner or swimmer, you’ll add some strength training to the program to help with force production, but running and swimming will still be the primary tools you rely on to improve at running and swimming.Lifters, bodybuilders, and strength athletes often lose sight of the fact that they are really in the same situation. For us, heavy work on squats, deadlifts, bench presses, presses, power cleans and snatches, and leg presses and maybe barbell rows for bodybuilders, will comprise the vast majority of the productive effort we will expend throughout our training careers. Basic barbell training will be the foundation of our progress for the entirety of our gym lives, and all the other work we do – the assistance work – must be kept in the proper perspective.The primary lifts and the assistance exercises differ in one very important respect: the primary exercises can be trained and improved for years at a time, if the aforementioned injuries and distractions do not occur. The assistance exercises cannot. This is obviously due to the fact that the primary exercises are systemic in nature – they inherently affect the entire body because the entire body is involved in the exercise. Squats, presses, and deadlifts produce enough stress to induce hormonal changes and structural adaptations system-wide. These fundamental movements all have a kinetic chain that starts at the floor and ends with the bar in the hands. The arms are not in the kinetic chain of the squat because they do not move the bar, but they stabilize the weight. The bench press is the only primary exercise with a short kinetic chain (the legs not being a part of the kinetic aspect of the exercise, even though they are critical to benching heavy weights), but it includes enough muscle mass to meet the criteria by being able to improve throughout the lifter’s training career, if care is taken to balance it with the press so that the shoulders stay healthy.Assistance exercises use less muscle mass, a short kinetic chain, or are some variant of the parent exercise that is less efficient at allowing as much weight to be lifted. In my book, Starting Strength: Basic Barbell Training 3rd Edition, I categorize these exercises as either assistance exercises, which are variations on the parent exercise, like stiff-legged deadlifts, RDLs, close-grip benches, and low-box squats, or ancillary exercises, which work a group of muscles in a way that the primary exercises do not, like a chin-up or a back extension.Partial movements, like rack pulls, partial benches, and presses that use heavier weights through a shorter portion of the ROM of the parent exercise, can be improved right alongside their parent exercises, and can be used to drive progress for as long as they are trained. But they do not constitute a replacement for the parent exercise; rather, they are used to drive continued progress on the primary lifts for more advanced trainees. My comments in this article refer to exercises that are designed to train a muscle group, not a movement pattern. Ancillary exercises like curls, wrist curls, seated curls, preacher curls, dumbbell curls, dumbbell preacher curls, dumbbell front raises, dumbbell lateral raises, dumbbell flyes, anything done on one leg or with one hand, and 1615 or so of the 1621 exercises described in Bill Pearl’s Keys to the Inner Universe do not qualify as basic exercises, because they cannot be Trained for long-term progress – they can only be Exercised.One more thing: all the basic barbell exercises can be assessed with a one-rep maximum effort. This doesn’t mean that they should be tested for 1RM – it just means that they can be. Novices have a new 1RM every workout, since they are getting stronger every workout by doing sets of 5, and 1RM testing is pointless for novices. Probably for intermediates too, since they are still getting stronger every week. In contrast, assistance exercises cannot effectively be done for 1RM. Imagine a 1RM dumbbell fly, a 1RM wrist curl, or even a 1RM RDL, and you can easily see my point. These exercises are designed to be used for higher reps because they are designed to work a muscle group, and a 1RM test applied to an isolated muscle group is an excellent way to get very injured.{pagebreak}Most machines are designed to exercise a muscle group. So, all muscle group machines are automatically optional as hell. All the others are designed to mimic a barbell exercise, but to remove the balance component of the movement. Hammer Strength makes lots of these things. I think it is important to be able to fall down when you do a barbell exercise, so that you have to make sure you don’t. The balance aspects of the movement are critical to the training effect, and when this is removed you are left with a Glorified Exercise. Leg presses are a good example of a Glorified Exercise, but I’ll admit that some bodybuilders have used them successfully to build a massive pair of legs. I wonder how much they can squat. (It has always been my observation that a guy with a big squat has a big leg press, but that the converse is never true.)Likewise, bodyweight-only exercises like situps, pushups, burpees, air squats, one-legged squats, handstand pushups, bodyweight dips, exercises done on rings, and kettlebell exercises – any exercise whose loading variable is the number of reps or the length of the set, and which does not have a 1RM – cannot drive a strength improvement. This is because after about 10 reps, and depending on your bodyweight, they are not limited by your force production ability; they are endurance exercises. Their repetitive nature means that they are inherently sub-maximal in terms of force production. They cannot make you stronger unless you are very weak, and they cannot continue to make you stronger for more than a couple of weeks even if you are.Look in your notebook and ask yourself this question: How long have you been able to add weight on a weekly or even monthly basis to your back extensions? Your tricep work? Your situps, curls, lunges, dumbbell rows, and behind-the-neck lat pulldowns? Can you swing a set of 5 with a 300-pound kettlebell? And if you can, what made you that strong, kettlebells or squats? Even very useful ancillary movements such as chins have a limited ability to continue to strengthen for long periods of time. And none of them get strong for as long as your squat does.This does not mean that these exercises are not useful in the context of a correctly designed training program. But it does mean that programs based on them are not Training, for the same reason that programs that do not drive regular, programmed improvements in the primary lifts are not Training.
There are many successful “strength coaches” who have made careers out of writing programs that are actually just lists of exercises done in some way or another, that appear to work satisfactorily. The inescapable fact that many pro-level athletes get away with Exercising instead of Training is a function of elite-level genetics, not exercises posing as Training. Every professional or D1 athlete spending his time in the weight room adding to his collection of unilateral balancing tricks is wasting his potential for strength improvement, and strength is the most basic of athletic adaptations. All other aspects of performance depend on strength – this is why athletes take steroids. There are no “balance steroids” and no “agility steroids” and no “endurance steroids” and no “core steroids.” And it is why they should be squatting, pressing, and deadlifting instead of playing around with “Bulgarian Split Squats” and other such silly distractions from the real task at hand. Even Elite-level athletes who have not actively pursued a linear increase in barbell strength still have the potential to do so, and the failure to get stronger always represents wasted potential. This is especially tragic if that failure is the result of following the advice of a “strength coach” who doesn’t really know how to increase an athlete’s strength. Catching up will always involve squats, presses, benches, and deadlifts, and may also involve getting another strength coach.Look around your gym and count the guys who are just exercising. They’re physically quite easy to spot: they are neither big nor strong. What are they doing – full squats and deadlifts, or standing in front of the dumbbell rack? Are they standing with heavy barbells in their hands, or sitting with dumbbells in their laps? Where has most of their time been spent in today’s workout, on one foot or two, in a balanced symmetrical stance or staggered in some version of a split? How many have a training log, and how many of these guys are writing down all the exercises they just did instead of referring to what their log tells them they are supposed to do today?History tells us what works in the gym, and everything else walks down the road with a carrot in its ass. Guys that have spent their careers in the gym know what works and what doesn’t, if the focus of their practice has been demonstrable improvement in strength for everybody that comes through the door. Training results in long-term progress in a specific direction, while Exercise gets you tired and sweaty, satisfying the desire for a feeling of accomplishment for people who are easily satisfied. Training utilizes loaded movements that have the ability to generate long-term progress – squats, presses, bench presses, deadlifts – and Exercise can use any damn thing it wants to, because Exercise doesn’t care about the long term, it just cares about today. Basic heavy barbell movements are what the strongest, biggest men of the past century have used to get that way. Assistance exercises are merely the things these men do in the gym after they have Trained, while they are resting. Quit wasting time and start training the basic lifts, and save the assistance exercises for later. If there’s time.

Thursday, January 28, 2016

How to use the TUBOW | Jayson Ball & Noah Milstein

Starting Strength Coaches Jayson Ball and Noah Millstein demonstrate proper use of the TUBOW - Terribly Useful Block Of Wood.The TUBOW is a valuable tool in helping lifters avoid forward knee travel and allowing for maximum use of the hips in The Squat.
See More



var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true};

by Jayson Ball, SSC and Noah Milstein, SSC



Starting Strength Coaches Jayson Ball and Noah Millstein demonstrate proper use of the TUBOW - Terribly Useful Block Of Wood.The TUBOW is a valuable tool in helping lifters avoid forward knee travel and allowing for maximum use of the hips in The Squat.

The CrossFit Kitchen: Chipotle Chicken Frittata




In this video, Nick Massie of PaleoNick.com shares his recipe for chipotle chicken frittata, a delicious dish that combines eggs, ground chicken, bacon and veggies for a savory breakfast-inspired meal you can enjoy anytime.



First Massie tosses the chopped bacon into a preheated cast-iron skillet, rendering the fat to "provide the cooking agent for our chicken, our veggies."



Once the bacon, chicken and veggies are browned and seasoned, he slices baked yams and layers them in the bottom of a baking dish, where they serve as the crust for the frittata.



He spreads the meat-and-veggies mixture over the yams, pours blended eggs over the top and bakes until everything is golden brown.



For finishing touches, he prepares a batch of his salsa chipotle and chops a few sprigs of cilantro for garnish.



To download the recipe for chipotle chicken frittata, click here.



Video by Nick Massie.



4min 26sec



Additional reading: "Breakfast Cupcakes" by Shirley Brown and Alyssa Dazet, published March 12, 2013.

The Charged Connection: Exercise and Leadership

Have you ever wondered what successful leaders in the work world have in common?

Have you ever wondered what successful leaders in the work world have in common? What helps them inspire the people they lead and guide their teams toward successful and meaningful professional outcomes?



read more

Wednesday, January 27, 2016

3 Microstrategies for Intelligent Progression

Small, thoughtful changes to your methods can add up to big progress down the road.


Charles is here on a weekly basis to help you cut through the B.S. and get some real perspective regarding health and training. Please post feedback or questions to Charles directly in the comments below this article.





This week I thought I’d share a few strength training workout strategies I’ve never mentioned in print before. These ideas can be applied to almost anyone’s goals and almost any type of workout. Try them, enjoy them, and share them.


read more

Addicts and Anecdotes


More and more, science is confirming what athletes report anecdotally: Avoiding sugar can dramatically improve health and performance.



The first week was hard. Really hard.



"My body told me it wanted sugar," said Tanya Chick.



An athlete at CrossFit E-Town in Evanston, Illinois, Chick said she was addicted to Trader Joe's freeze-dried mangoes. Chick's mango fetish came to an end the moment she signed up for her affiliate's No Sugar November nutrition challenge last fall. She said conquering her sugar addiction was difficult, but soon her cravings went away and she started feeling better, sleeping better, performing better.



An Oct. 26 study in the journal Obesity supports Chick's anecdotal evidence from the November challenge. In "Isocaloric Fructose Restriction and Metabolic Improvement in Children With Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome," Dr. Robert Lustig and company replaced foods with added sugars with other foods but kept caloric intake steady for participants. The resulting data indicated health markers improved dramatically in the study's 43 subjects after just 10 days of following a low-sugar diet.



"It's hard to put into words what (avoiding sugar) does to you. It just makes you feel better," Chick said.



Chick might not have the words to describe exactly how reduced sugar consumption affected her, and many affiliates only have anecdotal evidence to justify the success of no-sugar challenges, but researchers are providing more and more backup. The science is sound, Lustig said, and has helped bring the negative consequences of consuming added sugar into the mainstream.

Training Optimality Tested | Nicholas Racculia

In part one of two, Nicholas Racculia begins his analysis of training log data from the Starting Strength forums. This video was recorded during the Starting Strength Coaches Association Conference that took place in October 2015.

Tuesday, January 26, 2016

Starting Strength Podcast | Physical Therapy Done Right with John Petrizzo

Doctor of Physical Therapy and Starting Strength Coach John Petrizzo joins the podcast to discuss his work in the field of physical therapy - a profession rife with silly bullshit. Dr. Petrizzo also gives us his tips on surviving a snowpocalypse after receiving a dire prediction from Rip.

Audio version: Starting Strength Podcast 16-01-26
Subscribe: RSS | iTunes



var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true};

The Group X Business Model is Failing the Fitness Industry

The group business model that almost all CrossFit affiliates use is not suited to the success of these individual businesses.

I am not here to criticize CrossFit. CrossFit is successful and has been instrumental in changing the fitness industry for the better. CrossFit has created countless opportunities for coaches. CrossFit understands the free market model, because each independently owned gym is free to deliver the product as it so chooses.



read more

Monday, January 25, 2016

Unstoppable: Cassidy Duffield




"If you would've told me 10 months ago that I was going to compete in weightlifting in a national championship, I would've laughed and called you a liar because I just never thought that I could do something like that," says Cassidy Duffield of Salt Lake City CrossFit.



A former gymnast, Duffield admits she was once self-conscious about having broad shoulders and a muscular figure. When her gymnastics career ended, she looked forward to being "skinny" because she no longer needed muscles.



Things have changed since then. When a friend introduced Duffield to CrossFit, she was hesitant. She was still plagued by self-confidence issues, and Olympic lifting intimidated her—a condition that was exasperated when her first workout was Grace. But after just a couple of months of CrossFit, her body image began to change.



"Everything about CrossFit has shown me that I can do amazing things by myself, and it's been a really crazy journey in finding myself and trying to believe in myself," she says.



Today, Duffield is focusing on coaching and Olympic-weightlifting meets. She has some advice for young women everywhere: "Believe in yourself and don't compare yourself to others at all. Focus on what you've accomplished and always believe that you're unstoppable."



Video by Mariah Moore and Jay Vera.



8min 17sec



Additional reading: "Beyond the Body" by Louis Hayes, published April 21, 2010.

Weightlifting: Sport or Training Modality?

Weightlifting is more well-known than ever before, so now is a good time to actually understand the term.

We’ve been running the Takano Weightlifting coaching internship program since July of 2014 and have had 23 interns graduate. I get inquiries and resumes all the time from prospective internship candidates. And whenever I present at courses or seminars, I end up discussing weightlifting with plenty of newcomers.



read more

SS Weekly Report January 25, 2016

The Starting Strength Weekly Report 2016-01-25: Topics from the Forums: “When to offer advice” and “Advice for an aspiring coach.” This week Under the Bar: Training Camps.

View report in browser

View report archive



var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true};

News
Announcements

Jenni Pertuset is this month’s Under the Bar winner.
Submit your images to enter this month’s Under the Bar prize drawing.


Articles

In Women in Service, CJ Gotcher outlines an effective training template for women looking to fill the more physically demanding combat arms roles.
From the archives: College strength coach Jim Steel brings The Truth as he sees it.

Training Log

Joe Leppo gives us a workout to workout example of using the Starr Rehab Protocol in Rehabilitating a Severe Adductor (Groin) Tear

Podcast

Suboptimal Training Conditions with Joe Leppo - Rip & Joe discuss training on a boat, submarine life, and the right way to rehab injuries. All while not divulging classified information.


From the Coaches

Dr Jonathon Sullivan joins the Senior Rehab Project for the podcast Barbells, Just What the ER Doctor Ordered.


Under the Bar



Kylie McQuire at the start of the deadlift during the Starting Strength Camp in Sydney. [photo courtesy of Tom Campitelli]


Aaron O’Donoghue finishes his deadlift while the peanut gallery looks on. [photo courtesy of Tom Campitelli]



Jordan discusses the finer points of the squat at PTC Sydney during the recent Australian tour. [photo courtesy of Tom Campitelli]



Chris Kurisko coaches an early set at Saturday’s Squat Training Camp at Black Iron Training. [photo courtesy of Spencer Irvin]

Click images to view slideshow.
Submit your images to report@startingstrength.com
Submission guidelines to enter this month’s Under the Bar prize drawing.


Best of the Week
When to offer advice
Beau S
In a podcast interview with Tom Campitelli about his journey to becoming a Starting Strength Coach, you mention that as someone gets stronger, he naturally becomes an informal coach because others begin to approach him for training suggestions. I’m wired as a coach by upbringing and personality, and would love to help others get stronger, but I am also convinced that someone who knows a little is often more dangerous than someone who knows nothing. Based on comments you’ve made, it seems you agree.
In your experience, how much training does someone need under his belt before he becomes useful in offering advice to others, and is there any way to accelerate or optimize this process (e.g., by studying certain things)?


Mark Rippetoe
I’d say that when you have finished a novice progression you’re in a position to report on your findings. That’s more help that most people ever have a chance to obtain.




Best of the Forum
Advice for an aspiring coach/non-prof
darowe
I am a 28 year old Marine veteran (proud to have served and humbled by the company I kept) who recently began the Starting Strength program with my wife. With the gains we have seen mentally and physically in our time we feel like strength training is our new ancient Chinese secret. It is beyond effective, especially when compared with other popular and previously attempted workout programs, systems and services. In retrospect, even our gains during our time spent with Crossfit in its various iterations over the years boiled down to barbell training with progressively more challenging weights.
On a personal level, though, strength training has helped me manage my PTSD and other service connected disabilities on an amazing level. Getting under the bar awakens that warrior spirit that my transition to the civilian world squelched, and gives me new purpose and clear targets to aim for. I feel, deeply, like many more veterans and disabled veterans (actually, EVERYONE) could benefit greatly from the power and personal improvement that comes from strength training; however, I am currently a novice at best.
I do not expect easy answers, but rather a critique of my current course and any suggestions you might offer.

I am currently the coach for my wife and I- not out of hubris, but because it’s either me or no one. I have friends who are becoming interested, but I only offer to help on the condition that they understand I am a novice at best. I intend to do my best to improve as quickly as possible with my own experience so that I can help them in an adequate fashion, but am I getting ahead of myself? Is there a better way to learn proper coaching without potentially risking others?
I have been consuming (and re-consuming) your first book, and continue to break into programming with Practical Programming and Jim Wendler’s 5/3/1 outline before I must move onto intermediate/advanced programming. Do you have any recommendations?
Ultimately, if I can reach a level of adequacy as a coach, I would like to open a non-profit gym to offer free strength training to veterans and disabled veterans to help them help themselves. I believe that strength training would offer focus and physical well-being that could be a stepping stone to better overall health and success in life. I do not want to rush into it half cocked, though. Do you have any suggestions on the subject? Any areas of research I might consider?



Mark Rippetoe

You are learning the way all good coaches learn. Keep notes, learn to turn your results into data, learn from the data. If you hurt anybody, give them their money back.
Read everybody’s stuff, just so you’ll know what’s being written and thought about. But be critical while you do. If it makes no sense, has no basis in logic, lacks effective analysis, or consists entirely of an appeal to authority, don’t be afraid to say so.
You’re in luck. All strength training gyms are non-profit. The gym will develop as a natural consequence of your training and coaching experience. You’ll know when it’s time.

Sunday, January 24, 2016

3 of the Best: This Week's Top Articles, Vol. 14

These pieces have caught your attention throughout the week. So here they are in one place for you to consume, digest, and enjoy.

Welcome to our brand new weekend roundup, Three of the Best! Every Sunday, we'll post up Breaking Muscle's top three articles of the week. These pieces have caught your attention throughout the last seven days. So here they are in one place for you to consume, digest, and enjoy.



read more

Saturday, January 23, 2016

Is Perfectionism Holding Your Training Back?

If your standards are improperly high, you may never see the progress you're looking for.

In today’s world, perfectionism is a popular term. It’s dropped by apologetic neat freaks as they adjust skewed picture frames, not-so-apologetic brides at meetings with their florists, and far too many job seekers at office interviews.



I have had a lifelong struggle with trying to be perfect. Now, I believe the concept to be at best harsh and at worst, dangerous. It isn’t something I strive for in my training. And it shouldn’t be something you target, either.



read more

Rommel Cinco: “Never Better”




In this video, Rommel Cinco describes his personal journey with CrossFit, and Madeline and Jimi Letchford share what he means to the community at Cinco CrossFit in Ladero Ranch, California.



Cinco was the first member to join the Letchfords at their new box. He recalls coming in for the first time and seeing "guys going up and down the rope like spiders."



He almost walked out but instead started coming every day. Now he's the "spirit of the gym," and he provided the inspiration for its name.



Being part of his local CrossFit community became even more important for Cinco when he was diagnosed with aggressive metastasized lung cancer that had spread to his brain. His doctors gave him four weeks to live. That was 18 weeks ago.



Cinco recounts an ongoing debate: "The doctors and my wife think ... I'm fighting cancer and I need to save my energy to fight cancer, and my response is, ‘I'm fighting cancer. I need to be as strong as I can to fight cancer.'"



He adds: "That's what CrossFit is doing for me. It's making me stronger to beat this thing."



His battle hasn't gone unnoticed by those who train beside him.



"For our community, he's been such a source of emotional strength," says Madeline Letchford. "He's a fighter."



Video by Jordan Gravatt



15min 39sec



Additional reading: "Exercise Is the Drug" by Chris Cooper, published Dec. 8, 2015.

Friday, January 22, 2016

Quit Your Diet: A Sustainable Approach to Lasting Results

Commit to healthy habits that will make your future self proud.

Less than an hour after waving goodbye to 2015 and ringing in the New Year, the search term “weight watchers” saw its highest number of views out of any other day during the past year, according to Google Trends. If you’re betting your bottom dollar as to what’s on people’s minds this time of year, it’s safe to say that shedding pounds tops the list.



read more

From the Archives: The Truth

by Jim Steel



“I am a college strength coach, and I am struggling. I am struggling with the state of strength training today. Whether it is training athletes or training the general population, there are a few basic tenets – commandments if you will – that have been thrown out the door and been replaced by soft workouts. I have gone back and forth with myself about either honestly expressing my opinions about the whole damn thing or holding it all in and risking a stroke. I believe that I have held this in long enough. So here goes: the truth as I see it.”


Read More


var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true};

Thursday, January 21, 2016

Defeat Poor CrossFit Movement With These Work-Rest Strategies

No one will care how well you did on today’s workout three years from now, but you will remember if you injure yourself.
Every minute on the minute (EMOM) and you go, I go (YGIG) training sessions reinforce the quality of movements. In this article, I discuss workouts that reinforce low-quality movements and how we can improve by focusing on virtuosity.

read more

Rehabilitating a Severe Adductor Group (Groin) Tear

Self-assessment is hard for most dedicated lifters. As workouts become more difficult (with heavier weights) and more complex (with programming modifications) there is often an internal debate that goes on within the mind of the lifter: usually after a really, really hard set. This internal debate can usually be simplified down to two voices: one calling for caution (more rest, lift less weight, skip that last set, etc.) and one extolling the virtues of backbone and grit while imploring the trainee to lift the damn weight in order to get stronger (Don’t be a pussy). Unfortunately, sometimes we listen to the wrong voice; I’m certainly no exception.After a significant training lay-off, that included an overseas relocation, I was anxious to resume training and regain some of my lost strength levels. Once I was settled in at my new home, with a newly equipped garage gym, I dove right back into a modified linear progression and was rewarded with steady progress towards my goals. Everything was going great – until early November…Read More var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true}; by Joe Leppo, SSC Self-assessment is hard for most dedicated lifters. As workouts become more difficult (with heavier weights) and more complex (with programming modifications) there is often an internal debate that goes on within the mind of the lifter: usually after a really, really hard set. This internal debate can usually be simplified down to two voices: one calling for caution (more rest, lift less weight, skip that last set, etc.) and one extolling the virtues of backbone and grit while imploring the trainee to lift the damn weight in order to get stronger (Don’t be a pussy). Unfortunately, sometimes we listen to the wrong voice; I’m certainly no exception.After a significant training lay-off, that included an overseas relocation, I was anxious to resume training and regain some of my lost strength levels. Once I was settled in at my new home, with a newly equipped garage gym, I dove right back into a modified linear progression and was rewarded with steady progress towards my goals. Everything was going great – until early November.The Injury: On a Monday night, following the first of three planned squat sets at 345x5x3, I found myself engaged in the previously mentioned internal debate. The first set was a lot harder than it “should have” been based on last Friday’s workout and I felt an unusual sensation in my left inner thigh while performing the reps: an extreme tightness that extended from the knee up through the groin into my lower abdomen that made me think of an overly tightened guitar string. Not exactly pain, but certainly an indication that something was not quite right. I thought about it for a little while, and decided to take a few extra minutes of rest and then continue on with my planned workout. I chose very, very poorly.During the descent on the first rep of the second squat set, I felt as though my left thigh had been coated with an invisible and highly flammable solution that was ignited by jamming a cattle prod into my groin – just as I felt an unwelcomed tearing sensation radiate throughout my inner thigh. This level of pain gets your attention very quickly. Completely incapable of resisting further downward movement, I fell forward immediately with the power rack safety arms catching the barbell and preventing me from being stapled to the deck like a rat caught in a trap.Later, while I was waiting in the Emergency Room for something stronger than ibuprofen – after driving for 45 minutes while trying to ice the injury site without freezing the delicate, sensitive, and very important structures located nearby – I had some time to reflect on how I’d managed to injure myself. To begin with, I’d started the workout feeling stale and tired. I strongly suspect I’d not fully recovered from the previous Friday’s squat workout. In this instance, I was trying to milk a few more weeks out of linear progression before moving on to more complicated programming. So in a nutshell: a lack of adequate recovery, greed and impatience with respect to training progress and significant stubbornness contributed to my injury. Bruising on the inner thigh a few days after tearing an adductor. Photo credit: Emily Socolinsky The Rehab: Until you significantly injure your adductor group, you don’t realize how much the muscle group is used during normal daily activities. Everything hurts: walking, getting out of bed, rolling over, trying to climb into your pick-up truck, etc. Daily activities become difficult and painful. Based on the injury mechanism, the results of the physical exam and sonogram performed at the Emergency Room, and the significant bruising present, I knew I was dealing with a muscle belly injury. I immediately equated muscle belly injury with the Starr Rehabilitation Protocol. I’d successfully used it before for other minor injuries, but this was the most serious and painful injury I’d ever experienced lifting weights. I figured it couldn’t hurt to consult with a more experienced Coach; someone I knew had much more experience than me in dealing with a multitude of injuries. So, in a phone call on the Thursday afternoon following the injury: Rip: Alright Joe, what did you do to yourself? Joe: Rip: Dammit Joe, you already know what I’m going to tell you. You need to lift on it tonight. Joe: Really? Tonight? It’s only been a couple of days… Rip: Tonight. What weight were you at when the tear occurred? Joe: 345 Rip: You need to work your way up to around 65 pounds. What time are you going to get home and lift tonight? Joe: Ughhh…Around 5:30 or so. Rip: Call me at the gym as soon as you finish. You’re going to have to narrow your stance and go with the toes more forward than your usual stance; you want to work the injury area as much as you can withstand without overstressing it. With the change to your stance you’re going to end up squatting much more upright than you’re used to. Let me know how it goes. I can remember thinking, “Wow. That certainly escalated quickly…I guess I’m going home and squatting tonight. Looks like I don’t have much choice…” I spent the rest of the afternoon dreading the upcoming workout. My trepidation was not unwarranted. The first couple of rehabilitation workouts were VERY unpleasant. Sets of 20 or 25 absolutely suck under the best of circumstances; with an injury they become diabolical – even at light weights. I kept thinking that Jesus might show up and speak to me during the final reps of each set. He didn’t, but Sheev Palpatine sure did. However, the injury area did feel ever so slightly better following the first workout. I decided to continue on with the rehabilitation program despite the discomfort. I noticed marked improvement while performing daily activities after about a week. By the time I finished the rehab program, although I wasn’t 100% recovered, the injury was only really bothering me during subsequent squat workouts. The key elements of the Starr Rehabilitation Protocol are light weights with high reps while using perfect form, lifting everyday consecutively for 2 weeks, and dropping the number of reps as required while increasing the weights used daily. It is a deceptively simply program, but hard, hard work to actually execute. JOE’S STARR REHAB WORK – AS ACTUALLY PERFORMED DATE DAY WORKOUT / COMMENTS 11/01/16 I ADDUCTOR TEAR INJURY OCCURS ATTEMPTING TO SQUAT 345x5x3 11/02/16 0 REST/OFF 11/03/16 0 REST/OFF 11/04/16 1 SQUAT 45x20 / 55x20 / 65x20 11/05/16 2 SQUAT 65x20 / 75x20 / 85x20 11/06/16 3 SQUAT 75x20 / 85x20 / 95x20 11/07/16 4 SQUAT 85x20 / 95x20 / 105x20 11/08/16 5 SQUAT 95x20 / 105x20 / 115x20 11/09/16 6 SQUAT 105x20 / 115x20 / 125x20 11/10/16 7 MISSED WORKOUT 11/11/16 8 SQUAT: 115x20 / 125x20 / 135x20 11/12/16 9 SQUAT: 125x20 / 135x20 /145x20 11/13/16 10 SQUAT: 135x20 / 145x20 / 155x15 11/14/16 11 SQUAT: 145x15 / 155x15 / 165x15 11/15/16 12 SQUAT: 155x15 / 165x15 / 175x15 11/16/16 13 SQUAT: 165x15 / 175x15 / 185x10 11/17/16 14 MISSED WORKOUT 11/18/16 — U.S. NAVY PHYSICAL FITNESS ASSESSMENT—NO LIFTING 11/19/16 — SQUAT (NARROW STANCE): 185x5 / 195x5 / 205x5 CONTINUE LINEAR PROGRESSION WITH NARROW STANCE – GRADUAL RETURN TO NORMAL STANCE 01/08/16 +9 WKS SQUAT: 345x5x3 (normal LBBS stance) Some notes and takeaways: Rip pushed me to start rehab 72 hours post-injury. Left to my own devices, I probably would have waited another day or two to start—which would’ve been a mistake. The hardest part is starting and completing the first 2-3 workouts. The goal is to accelerate healing without excessive scar tissue formation in the muscle belly. Based on this specific injury, my working weights, training history, etc., Rip advised me to work up to 65 lbs on Day 1 and 85 lbs on Day 2. Otherwise, I would have started Day 1 at 45x25x3 and Day 2 at 45x25 / 45x25 / 55x25, and then continued on with the progression. Depending on the injury and the rehab exercise used, you might have to use smaller jumps than 10 lbs based on what you can tolerate. Missing Day 7 did impact rehab progress with significant stiffness and increased soreness when I came back and worked the injury on Day 8. I don’t think missing Day 14 had much impact, however, since it was the final day anyway. I should’ve started with sets of 25 instead of 20. Somehow I had fixated on sets of 20 in my mind, even though I was previously familiar with the Starr Protocol. I don’t think this had a significant impact, but I wish I had done it optimally. The Starr Protocol is highly effective when used correctly for appropriate injuries. However, it is much more aggressive than usual physical therapy rehabilitation methodology. When I attended my mandatory physical therapy follow-up appointment (required by military medicine), and explained to the therapist (DPT) what I was doing and then showed him my training log progression, he was very surprised. He basically told me, that if I was willing to endure the discomfort and continue to exercise the area as I’d described, there wasn’t really anything else he could do for me to speed recovery. He also indicated he wished more of his patients were willing to work that hard on rehabilitating their injuries – something that has been discussed on a number of occasions within the Starting Strength community boards and social media. This little injury cost me nine weeks of progress, but I was able to bounce back, rehab the injury, and continue on with my training thanks to the use of the Starr Rehab Protocol. I hope you never need to use it yourself, but if you do, I hope my narrative is helpful as you learn to deal with your own injuries and continue pursuing your own training goals. And watch out for Sheev, he usually shows up around rep 17 or so.

The CrossFit Kitchen: Lemon-Pepper Chicken With Butternut Squash

This time on The CrossFit Kitchen, Nick Massie of PaleoNick.com creates finger-lickin'-good lemon-pepper chicken.

Start by roasting the squash and chicken. In the meantime, heat a little olive oil in a cast-iron skillet and toast the garlic. Next, add the onions, mushrooms and stock to start a savory topping for your chicken. Three minutes later, toss in the roasted bell peppers and add a little romance with Massie's own Lemon Pepper Love spice mix. Bring to a simmer, reduce the heat and finish by stirring in butter.

When it comes to the parsley garnish, Massie reminds us to be particular: "This is flat-leaf parsley or Italian parsley—different from the curly stuff. Don't get the curly stuff."

The final result is a bed of butternut squash topped with zesty chicken and a mouth-watering veggie jus. Served family style or in individual portions, this hearty meal will keep you warm and full on winter days.

To download the recipe for lemon-pepper chicken, click here.

Video by Nick Massie.

5min 40sec

Additional reading: "Zone Meal Plans" by Greg Glassman, published June 23, 2015.

Wednesday, January 20, 2016

Why 90% of CrossFit Gyms Are Slowly Going Bankrupt

At the heart of the problem is the group exercise business model, which is fundamentally flawed for a CrossFit gym.

Affiliate gyms are failing at an alarming rate. Our sources in the insurance industry peg the number as more than 100 a month. It doesn't seem possible.

read more

Women in Service

by C.J. Gotcher “Opening up the combat arms to women will be a difficult adjustment…but we can help prepare for them with effective physical training; developing stronger, faster, and more resilient candidates who can excel at the standards in their pipeline schools.” Read More var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true}; Opening up the combat arms to women will be a difficult adjustment…but we can help prepare for them with effective physical training; developing stronger, faster, and more resilient candidates who can excel at the standards in their pipeline schools. When it comes to women serving in the combat arms in the US, there is no more debate as to “if.” Secretary Carter has formally announced that all combat positions, including special operations, will be open for women to apply. For the women who choose to apply, it won’t be easy for a number of reasons, not least of which is the military’s often archaic approach to physical training. My hope here is to outline an effective training template for women looking to fill the more physically demanding combat arms roles now available to give them the best chance for success.Strength FirstThe program here is specifically aimed at women within the DOD’s height/weight standard (this is who I mean when I say “you”). However, most of these program recommendations apply equally to the average woman and lightweight/underweight men who lack the lean mass necessary to complete critical military tasks. The literature is clear on the benefits of added strength and muscle in preparation for military training, especially for those who aren’t already strong: “Less than 7 months of lower extremity weight-training [is] significantly associated with stress fracture incidence.”[1] “In addition to being positively associated with load carriage and lifting, LBM [lean body mass] is related to other military task performances… LBM tended to be positively associated with the ability to push, carry, and exert torque.” [2]“Paradoxically, it may be that the least fat women trainees were at greater risk [of injury] for the converse reason: too little lean body mass.” [3] If you can’t do a pull-up with forty pounds of added weight or deadlift twice your bodyweight, how do you expect to climb a rope with a pack or safely execute a buddy-drag for a man who may weigh 70 pounds more than you? The good news is that despite some broscience to the contrary, you are not a Krillin-esque sidekick, unable to meaningfully improve despite years of training. A review of the literature shows that although your top-end strength may not be as high, your muscles respond to training at the same rate as your male peers. [4]First, take advantage of this fact by devoting some time to a dedicated strength program (even if you already have at some point in your career). Center your training on the full-body foundational movements: the squat, deadlift, press, bench press, power clean (or power snatch), chin-ups, and dips. Spend at least 5-6 months on a basic progressive program like Starting Strength. Commit to the training. Buy the books that underlie the program you choose or find a qualified trainer to coach it since the effectiveness of the program past the first month or so will depend on your technique and how well you adapt it to your personal capability and history.During this crucial period, ensure you’re using proper technique in the lifts and keep extra training to a minimum. I have yet to meet anyone who developed great initial strength while running 40 miles a week, man or woman. At the very start of your strength program, I’d only do one assistance exercise beyond the major barbell lifts: chin-ups. The strength required to complete dead hang pull-ups or chin-ups is critical to many service tests and challenges. Four or five days a week, do 5 max-minus-one sets (end the set when you really could do one more). Use weight-assisted platforms, bands, or (as a last resort) a box assist to allow you to do at least 4 reps per set. When you can consistently finish 10 reps in a set with a given assistance, use less help (so you’re back to 4-5 reps a set) and continue with the routine until you’re doing them support-free. When you can do 10 at bodyweight, add weight and continue as before. Focus on form first, keeping your neck and body upright, pulling the shoulder blades back through the rep, and eliminating the help of a ‘kip.’ I have yet to meet a woman within height/weight standards who couldn’t do at least 5 excellent pull-ups after 6 months of consistent, progressive pull-up training (and that’s being conservative).About 3 months into your strength program, add in conditioning once a week, focusing on high intensity intervals. For “conditioning,” I’m referring to events other than running, rucking, or swimming, which are important and will come in later. My personal preferences for conditioning are the Prowler, rowing ergometer, Versa-Climber, and Wingate, but anything that allows you to complete full-body work at maximal intensities will be useful. The purpose here is to begin increasing overall volume and prepare you for the next phase.{pagebreak}“Life is a Marathon”Strength never disappears entirely from our focus, but we’ll have to dedicate more energy towards conditioning and run/swim/ruck training after we’ve exhausted the early strength gains and progress slows. Aerobic fitness is critical to getting through most military accession programs – for those who are already strong, a poor 1-mile run time is one of the single greatest predictors of injury rate at initial entry training.[1,5,6,7,8] In fact, a study of Army Basic Combat Training found that women who could perform at the same level as men at the 1-mile run were no more likely to be injured than men.[3]This makes some intuitive sense. Immediate performance at combat arms tasks like carrying a downed man, lifting and loading an artillery shell, and heaving a stuck Humvee out of a ditch all depend on strength. However, what fails many people in these programs is the daily grind – the constant shuffling and running from place to place and the inability to recover from excessive volume. Since women have less hemoglobin per unit blood than men [9], you can’t just get away with being relatively lean, strong, and in “generally good shape.” You’ll need to become excellent, and the easiest way to do this is to increase conditioning volume slowly and progressively. At first, simply add in a second conditioning day per week of steady-state work (working at about a 7-8 out of 10 on effort for 30 minutes) and decrease your strength training volume, perhaps following a 3-day Heavy-Medium-Light routine instead of hitting it hard every day. Each week, increase your conditioning work: one more interval, a little faster or longer on the steady-state work, etc. This doesn’t mean you won’t or shouldn’t continue to gain in strength – you’ll just have to progress more slowly, only increasing weight on the bar perhaps once a week. Lastly, you’re going to need to include dedicated time running and (depending on which branch of the combat arms you’re intending to join) rucking and/or swimming. The most common injuries for women in military training appear to be lower body overuse injuries (stress fractures and the like), due to poor running-specific preparation.[8]Running is particularly important to passing both military tests and getting through many of the training programs and, unfortunately, it interferes with strength training pretty harshly. To minimize the interference between the strength program and increasing running volume, start running on a “countdown” from the start date of your intro pipeline. Then, 6-8 months prior to your training, you should substitute a progressive running program for your weekly conditioning work (which can and should still be done around your strength training to maintain or even continue to grow muscle). Your goal here is not to train for a marathon, but to adapt your body to the kind of running volumes you’ll experience during training. The Navy SEAL Physical Preparation Guide provides an excellent template for the kind of intelligent, slow increases in weekly volume that produce results and can be implemented concurrent to a strength program.[10]Start with fewer miles than you think you need to and progress slowly. This kind of patient progress may be frustrating, but it’s critical. “Incompletely recovered lower body injury” is a serious predictor of re-injury and dropout from combat training [7], and excessive mileage too quickly is a great way to fumble it at the finish line. One thing I’ve been asked is: “So how do I know I’m ready?” No metrics are set in stone here, and I don’t like them to begin with – “metrics” tend to become ceilings to ram up against rather than goals to be surpassed. As a woman aiming for the combat arms, you want to be in the top 5% of military women for strength and the top 10% for aerobic fitness. As an initial goal, I’d encourage you to work towards a double-bodyweight deadlift for a set of five and a mile run time of 7:45 or faster, and to keep getting stronger and faster from there.NutritionUnderlying all your training is your nutrition. If you want to serve in a physically demanding combat profession, eat with the intention of fueling a badass killing machine. Here are the basics: First (and this is the hardest one for many women), get about a gram of protein per pound bodyweight, the majority through lean meat, dairy, and egg sources: lean beef, chicken, turkey, pork, cottage cheese, low-fat milk, Greek yogurt, eggs and egg whites, fish, shrimp, and other seafood. This amounts to roughly 8 palm-sized servings of meat a day for most women, though it will be a little less in real life since most vegetables and grains have protein that will fill out the amount. These foods kill three birds with one stone, providing calcium, and iron (of which most women are deficient) and supporting lean muscle gains. Single-ingredient natural foods are better than processed ones and should make up most of your diet, but don’t get too neurotic about whether a food is “clean enough” or “Paleo enough.” Also, be careful about drastic food restrictions. It’s very difficult for a vegan to get enough protein to drive the muscle growth we’re looking for. Vegan bodybuilders have proven it is doable, but there are no quinoa and pea protein powder MREs. Sudden shifts between home and field dieting can lead to gastric distress and other problems at the worst possible time. Get a vegetable in each major meal of your day if you can (don’t sweat it for meals immediately around your workout). Despite what you may see on your Facebook feed, carbohydrates are not your enemy. They’re the fuel for repeat athletic (read: high power) performance and will be a necessary part of your diet. Try to get the majority of your carbs from fruits, vegetables, and whole grains rather than soda and Pop-Tarts. Supplements are optional and a small part of your program, but used intelligently, they can be helpful. Take 5 grams of creatine monohydrate a day. Use whey protein if needed to meet your protein goals and/or around your workouts, but most of your protein will be in “food form.” Take BCAAs between meals (at least 3 grams of leucine per “dose”), either alone or with a small amount of carbohydrates (I prefer steam-in-the-bag vegetables), to help stimulate muscle growth and maximize recovery. If you’re not getting any fish in your diet, consider up to 4 grams of EPA/DHA from fish oil a day. The entire depth of sports nutrition is outside the scope of this article, but if you want to deep-dive this, look into the works of smart nutrition coaches with an eye for strength training; coaches like Jordan Feigenbaum, Mike Israetel, John Berardi, and Rachel Cosgrove.{pagebreak}Too fat, or Too Small?One concern that comes up when it comes to women and strength training is body fat. “Will I be too fat to make height/weight standards,” and “how fat is too fat?” First, considering the challenges of some of these schools, let’s start with a better question: “How small is too small?” In WWII, there was no chart for “overweight,” just a “minimum” and a “standard acceptable weight.” Since women have to hold more body fat for health than men [11] and since you’re looking to build lean mass well beyond the minimum, first add a 5-15% buffer to the “standard acceptable weight.” For an easy quick reference, this means a BMI of 23-25 (24 happens to be the publicly-advertised average BMI of the top women competitors of the CrossFit Games). Aim for a body fat percentage of 14-18% at this BMI. This is your initial target. If you’re still progressing in your heavy strength training, gaining muscle mass, go ahead and progress bodyweight past this point (not more than a pound a week) and keep driving strength gains. If you’re at a higher bodyfat or are already plenty strong and want to lean out more, cut weight towards the bottom edge of that range. At the lower and middle ranges of this scale, you’re well clear of the Army and Marine Corps’ height/weight standards. At about 25 BMI, you’ll cross an imaginary line and have to be “taped” to measure body fat. If you’re gaining weight slowly and training to build lean mass, you should stay under the body fat requirement without issue, and you can always test yourself in advance if you’re ever concerned and adjust if necessary. You might get some flak for needing the tape (I’ve experienced it, and I know plenty of other servicemembers who have). If you’re slaying it in your training and a corpsman tells you a BMI of 26 is “dangerous for your health,” show him this study: Nutrition and Training Habits Associated with the Strongest and Fittest Special Operations Forces Operators.[12] When our nation’s Special Operations Forces average an “overweight” BMI (26.3), he can stuff it. Ends and Pieces There are a few final items I want to include that don’t quite fit above:Relative strength is key, so being strong and lean are both important, but never lean down to the point where your menstrual cycle stops in training. This remains true even if you’re strong and ripped (not just underweight). Amenorrhea is independently and significantly correlated to injuries in basic training, likely due to related hormonal imbalances. [1]The menstrual cycle’s effects on athletic performance are unique to the woman involved. Rather than go into the details here, I’ll point you to a solid article by Greg Nuckols on the topic. [13] For the TL:DR crowd, exercise tends to decrease the generalized negative effects of the menstrual cycle, and actual impacts to performance are likely to be small, although some women experience significantly greater discomfort regardless. Most contraceptives should have little to no impact on performance. Use your training as an experiment to see how you respond to strength and high intensity training and adapt accordingly. If you smoke now, quit smoking at least a month before training and minimize tobacco use altogether. Smokers (both men and women) consistently show lower pass rates at baseline accession schools.[6,7,14] Part of this is due to the health consequences of cigarettes and part of it is because access to tobacco in many of these pipelines is either limited or banned outright. Going cold-turkey is hard enough when you don’t have a 12-mile ruck to do.The Call to ServiceOpening up the combat arms to women will be a difficult adjustment for some, and some growing pains are sure to follow. Some of these are inevitable, but we can help prepare for them with effective physical training; developing stronger, faster, and more resilient candidates who can excel at the standards in their pipeline schools. We have the technology. We can rebuild you. Let’s make it happen. CJ Gotcher, CSCS, Pn1, SSC, is a barbell strength and conditioning coach with a passion for general health, high school athletes, and military preparation/selection. CJ completed 6 years as an active duty Naval Officer and is currently in the reserves, coaching out of Escondido, CA. References1. Rauh MJ, Macera CA, Trone DW, Shaffer RA, Brodine SK: Epidemiology of Stress Fracture and Lower Extremity Overuse Injuries for Female Recruits. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006 Sep; 38(9): 1571-7.2. Marriott, Bernadette M, and Judith Grumstrup-Scott. Body Composition and Physical Performance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1992. Pages 113-114. Print.3. Marriott, Bernadette M, and Judith Grumstrup-Scott. Body Composition and Physical Performance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1992. Page 168. Print.4. Smith GI, Mittendorfer B: Similar Muscle Protein Synthesis Rates in Young Men and Women: Men Aren’t From Mars and Women Aren’t From Venus. J Appl Physiol 2012 Jun; 112(11): 1803-4.5. Knapik Joseph J, Sharp Marilyn A, Canham-Chervak Michelle, Hauret Keith, Patton John F., Jones, Bruce: Risk Factors for Training-Related Injuries Among Men and Women in Basic Combat Training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Jun; 33(6): 946-54.6. Jones BH, Knapik JJ: Physical Training and Exercise-Related Injuries. Surveillance, Research, and Injury Prevention in Military Populations. Sports Med 1999 Feb; 27(2):111-25.7. Reis Jared P., Trone Daniel W., Macera Caroline A., Rauh Mitchell J.: Factors Associated with Discharge during Marine Corps Basic Training. Mil Med 2007; 172 (9): 936-941.8. Piantida NA, Knapik JJ, Brannen S, O’Connor F: Injuries during Marine Corps officer basic training. Mil Med 2000, 165:515-520.9. Murphy WG: The Sex Difference in Haemoglobin Levels in Adults – Mechanisms, Causes, and Consequences. Blood Rev 2014 Mar; 28(2): 41-7.10. Naval Special Warfare Physical Training Guide11. Baechle, Thomas R. Earle, Roger W. Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. Hong Kong; Human Kinetics, 2008, print.12. Beals Kim, Lovalekar Mita, San-Adams Thida, Darnell Matthew E, Baker Rachel, Abt John P., Sell Timothy C., Lephart Scott M.: Nutrition and Training Habits Associated with the Strongest and Fittest Special Operations Forces Operators. ACSM Annual Meeting Presentation, 2015. Accessed 20DEC2015 from Beals SOF Performance Nutrition.13. The Menstrual Cycle and Contraceptives: A Complete Guide for Athletes.14. Swedler DI, Knapik JJ, Williams KW, Grier TL, Jones BH: Risk Factors for Medical Discharge from United States Army Basic Combat Training. Mil Med 2011 Oct; 176(10): 1104-10.

Tuesday, January 19, 2016

Starting Strength Podcast | Suboptimal Training Conditions with Joe Leppo

Starting Strength Coach and Naval Officer Joe Leppo joins Rip on the podcast for conversation on training on a boat, submarine life, and the right way to rehab injuries. All while not divulging classified information. Audio version: Starting Strength Podcast 16-01-19 Subscribe: RSS | iTunes var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true};

Virtuosity in Photos: California Invasion

Open happiness or open diabetes?

Big Soda's advertising would have you believe its products are all part of a healthy, active, vibrant life. The reality is much different: Sugary sports drinks and sodas are fueling chronic disease and ruining the health of millions. It's time to push aside celebrity endorsements, catchy jingles and clever slogans to tell people the truth: Sugar is toxic.

From Nov. 8 to 19, CrossFit Inc. Founder and CEO Greg Glassman visited nine California affiliates as part of CrossFit's "California Invasion: Rally to Fight Big Soda." At each affiliate, he asked attendees to stand with him and support a warning label on sugary beverages in California.

Websites:
CrushBigSoda.com
WeBuiltThisBox.com

The Way You Stand Is Damaging Your Body

If this is your posture when standing for long periods, here's how to correct yourself before it's too late.
Today I want to talk to you about a posture I call “The One Leg Booty Pop.” Technically called “hanging on one hip,” it is where the entire body weight is shifted onto one weight-bearing leg. This posture causes the pelvis and hip to be in a position of adduction, and it is wrecking all sorts of havoc on you and your body.

read more

Monday, January 18, 2016

Banish Pain Permanently: Where You Think It Is, It Ain't

Don't just address the symptoms. Realignment will help you get to the root causes of your pain.

People come to me to help them deal with pain all the time. They usually want to reduce the cause of their pain to one specific event or a specific muscle that is tight or weak. However, there’s a little more to it than that.

read more

SS Weekly Report January 18, 2016

The Starting Strength Weekly Report 2016-01-16: Topics from the Forums: “Splitting your deadlifts into halting deadlifts and rack pulls” and “Program for women.” This week Under the Bar: Around the world. View report in browser View report archive var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true}; News AnnouncementsSubmit your images to enter this month’s Under the Bar prize drawing. Articles Follow Todd Peter’s journey in Strength Training and Stroke Recovery. Videos The Press with Brent Carter – Learn more on the why and how of The Press including fixes of common errors. Training Log Niki Sims brings us Three ways to NOT get Bulky from Lifting as she tackles old myths and unfounded fears of transformations into “bulky, jacked, muscle-kitten[s]” and “rippling, veiny, skinned yeti[s].” Podcast Ask Rip #18 – Rip answers a question from Milo Yiannopoulos on the correlation between low testosterone and victimhood culture. Under the Bar Jordan Feigenbaum coaching at the Starting Strength Camp put on by Jordan and Tom Campitelli at PTC Brisbane in Australia. [photo courtesy of Tom Campitelli] Nathan Wulff deadlifts under the watchful eye of Jordan Feigenbaum at the Starting Strength Camp held at PTC Brisbane in Australia. [photo courtesy of Tom Campitelli] A little over two weeks past surgery to improve the blood flow to his legs, Michael is back to deadlifting. With a substantial decrease in leg pain, this is the heaviest he has been able to deadlift to date. [photo courtesy of Kelli Nielson] Big shout-out from the Coach Rip fan community in Berlin, Germany. This is our Oly Coach explaining the well-known angle-diagram. [photo courtesy of Daniel Wölk] Grazyna, making strength gains in her 60s at Feral Fitness. [photo courtesy of Feral Fitness] Starting Strength Coach Jay Mund works with an out of town client on the starting position for the power clean. Our weekends are often spent coaching clients from the D.C/Northern Virginia area for our One Day Clinics. [photo courtesy of Emily Socolinksy] Click images to view slideshow. Submit your images to report@startingstrength.com Submission guidelines to enter this month’s Under the Bar prize drawing. Best of the Week Splitting your deadlifts into halting deadlifts and rack pulls noryon My last working set of 5 on the deadlift was 495x5. I am experimenting with Mark’s suggestion of dividing the pull into two parts to make recovery cycles more manageable and to not interfere as much with squatting 2-3 times per week. I believe that Starting Strength and/or Practical Programming both say that you ought to be able to do 8s with whatever your best set of 5 was on deads. I am nowhere near able to do that and in fact I am quickly realizing how weak I am off the floor. On rack pulls, however, I pulled a very easy set of 5 at 525. Should I even bother with the rack pulls or just focus on doing halting deads after every squat session? Mark Rippetoe Your floor pull will catch up. Make DAMN sure your low back is flat. Best of the Forum Program for women marina2015 I was curious if you can suggest resourceful info for female weight training. There is a lot of information/forums on weight training for men but not much for women. I am having a hard time finding information that is designed specifically for women depending on their goals. I am 35, weight 145lbs body fat 29%. I have been weight training for about 8 months. I see results where my body has slimmed though there is no weight or body fat change. My goal is to reduce my body fat but I’ve been unsuccessful in doing so. I eat healthy and watch my calories/macros. I’m a bit confused what those should be and what my focus should be here, how much protein do I need to intake in order to lean out but not bulk? Need I be focusing on growing in strength with more weight lifting or more cardio? Currently, I workout 4-5 days a week. My routine is upper body 2x a week, legs 2x a week for 30m followed by 30-45 min of cardio in my cardio zone. My goal is to look lean not bulky but I like the challenge of a weight. I’ve been getting a bit bored lately so motivation has been lacking. When I try to research more on weightlifting for women there’s lots of conflicting info as most of it is designed for body builders. Mark Rippetoe You seem to be confused about several significant issues regarding both training and diet. You haven’t read either the books or this website’s resources. Do so, and get back to us. Good luck. bluebutton There’s a lovely group of women who lift and log on this forum. I have been much encouraged by them. They range in age, height, and goals. I am 35, 5’4. I am now nearly 20lbs heavier (~155-160) than my adult weight (140), yet more pleased with my figure than I’ve ever been while stronger than I ever believed I could be. Starting Strength, the lifting method, and Starting Strength, the lifting program, are both well worth the time and effort to learn and experience. Will Morris I can assure you that it is virtually impossible for someone without toxic levels of testosterone in their body to achieve large, bulky muscular development. If it were so easy to do with minimal amounts of testosterone, I’d be a huge sumbitch. Emily You should read Starting Strength: Basic Barbell Training and Practical Programming. They will explain the answers to many of your questions. They are worth every penny. Then, get started on the program detailed in the books. There is no female-specific program. We need the same program, with whole body exercises, because it is the most effective, efficient way to increase strength. And increasing strength improves sugar metabolism, appearance, bone density, confidence, sport performance, balance… In fact, you could argue we need the same program even more. With a tenth of the testosterone of men, body part splits and steady state cardio? Ain’t nobody got time for dat! We’re starting from a handicap here! Upper/lower splits work at the start, but then, progress slows. So, you try cutting calories even more, until you mathematically can’t, without being very tired and getting that skinny-fat look going on… Which ties in to your stated goal – to lose body fat. This will be mostly determined by the composition of your diet. I agree with bluebuttons recommendation- read and understand why you can and should eat lots of protein, and fat, to fuel your squatting, pressing, benching and deadlifting. You won’t bulk up (not enough testosterone.) You’re providing your body with what it needs to make more muscle. Which, at rest, burns body fat anyway. And, after increasing your strength, if you decide that you’d like to drop a bit of fat weight, it’s so much easier to do. Just a bit of tinkering with carbohydrate intake and it will surprise you how much easier it is compared to previous attempts with inefficient approaches. Females are being set up to fail on never-ending cycles of counting calories, low fat diets, upper/lower training, high-rep sets and jogging. Jump off the mouse wheel and you won’t look back.

Sunday, January 17, 2016

3 of the Best: This Week's Top Articles, Vol. 13

These pieces have caught your attention throughout the week. So here they are in one place for you to consume, digest, and enjoy.

Welcome to our brand new weekend roundup, Three of the Best! Every Sunday, we'll post up Breaking Muscle's top three articles of the week. These pieces have caught your attention throughout the last seven days. So here they are in one place for you to consume, digest, and enjoy.

olympic lift pull at college

read more

Friday, January 15, 2016

Soda Warning Label Still on Agenda in California

Bill dies in committee but supporters say anti-soda legislation is just a matter of time.

The effort to pass a recently failed bill requiring health-warning labels on sugar-sweetened beverages in California is a marathon, not a sprint, said sponsoring Sen. Bill Monning.

"While it's obviously a disappointment that we don't have an immediate vehicle … we won't just lie dormant. We will use 2016 to continue to educate members, and I think the most powerful persuasion for members here (is) in their districts," Monning told the CrossFit Journal on Jan. 15.

He might be right. On Jan. 13—the same day Monning withdrew Senate Bill 203 for consideration by the Senate Health Committee—Field Research Corp. released a statewide poll stating that 78 percent of voters support a warning label on sugary beverages. That's a slight increase from 2014, when 74 percent of California voters supported such a measure.

Monning, a Democrat from Carmel and the Senate majority leader, first introduced the Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Safety Warning Act in February 2013 as Senate Bill 1000. The bill passed the Senate but ran out of time during the regular legislative session before the House could consider it. In February 2015, Monning again introduced the act—this time as SB 203. It failed to make it out of the Senate Health Committee.

Although Monning didn't have the votes in the Health Committee to get the legislation to the Senate floor this year, he said he remains cautiously optimistic about 2017, when lawmakers will receive new committee assignments.

"My intent (is) let's use the 2016 campaign season to inject it as a campaign issue in California," he said.

Are You Ready for a Bulking Phase?

Ask these questions to prepare for a successful muscle-building program.

In theory, bulking up is simple: train hard, eat well, and allow enough recovery time. So why are so many people unsuccessful in their attempts to pack on muscle mass?

read more